U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated, "If Iran seeks a civilian nuclear program, it can possess one—like many other countries—through the importation of enriched materials."
-- This condition had been proposed in previous negotiations, where negotiators suggested that Russia supply Iran’s reactors with uranium; however, Iran rejected this offer.
This renewed proposition can be interpreted in several ways:
1. Domestic and Israeli Pressure:
The shift in the U.S. administration's approach may stem from internal political pressures or lobbying from Israel.
Iran is unlikely to relinquish what it views as its sovereign right to nuclear knowledge and uranium enrichment.
As a result, this stance could hinder progress in the negotiations.
2. A Negotiation Tactic:
The statement may indicate a division of roles within the U.S. administration, serving as a strategic maneuver to exert pressure on Iran and compel the country to make concessions.
This approach is plausible and aligns with the negotiation methods usually used by President Trump.
3. Internal Messaging:
Alternatively, the statement may target a GOP audience and supporters of Israel, signaling that the administration maintains a hardline stance on Iran and is not being lenient.
This interpretation is also likely; however, it is expected that Trump will ultimately act according to his inclinations and overall vision regarding the Iranian deal.
No comments:
Post a Comment